I like to make stuff.
I especially like to make things from stuff other people already made. Some people call this mixed media. Others call it plagiarism, but those people don't matter.
My first thing is mixed media. I take vintage ads, old photos and other ephemera, mostly by Tim Holtz, and make stuff I like. It's like crafting but cool.
My second and favorite medium is digital editing. I am considered a "Master" on PicsArt which means I get to use stuff for free that other people have to pay for. It took a couple of years to master the interface, and what started as "I wonder if I could do this?", eventually became "I don't suck at this and I wish I could make money from this!"
I don't. I probably never will, but sometimes I imagine I'm rich from all the already art that I re-art.
I am a moderator for a space on PicsArt that I created and I have a decent amount of followers. It's cool, but is it art? That depends on who you ask.
Art is subjective. Those who are extremely talented painters, musicians, poets, and actors would probably say it isn't, but that's just how fancy people talk (see: Paris Hilton).
If I use an image that someone else took and make significant changes to it, who owns it? According to copyright law, the original photographer owns it. According to me, it should be mine, right? Or 50/50? I don't know.
I feel like I might be super brilliant.